On Tuesday night at the annual conference of the Pennsylvania Downtown Center, which provides technical assistance to Pennsylvania's Main Street and Elm Street revitalization communities (of which Scranton is one), Scranton Tomorrow received an award for best rehabilitation project. The project was the "Scranton, The Electric City" sign that was recently restored this past December. Whatever your feelings are on the methods of revitalization in Scranton, awards like this go a long way in attracting private investment. Congrats to Scranton. You should be proud of the efforts.
LV Dem wrote: On Tuesday night at the annual conference of the Pennsylvania Downtown Center, which provides technical assistance to Pennsylvania's Main Street and Elm Street revitalization communities (of which Scranton is one), Scranton Tomorrow received an award for best rehabilitation project. The project was the "Scranton, The Electric City" sign that was recently restored this past December. Whatever your feelings are on the methods of revitalization in Scranton, awards like this go a long way in attracting private investment. Congrats to Scranton. You should be proud of the efforts.
Please point me in the direction of scholarly literature that says buying a stupid "electric city" sign attracts business. I always thought that a town had to have low taxes, a cheap and abundant labor supply, a consumer market and a docile political climate (which it is NOT) in order to attract business. What was I thinking? If I knew a stupid sign was a magnet for business I'd propose to council building the world's largest as a way to make business appear out of thin air and make Scranton "take off."
And who did Scranton tomorrow receive an award from? Think about that. That stupid sign is just a facde that mystifies and hides the real power relations that exist in this city.
The Life and Death of American Cities, The Rise of the Creative Class, Comeback Cities... the list is huge and it suggests that the completion of projects such as the one that the Pennsylvania Downtown Center (www.padowntown.org) recognized highlights a greater focus on civic culture (Scranton, The Electric City--that's culture). Civic culture, not taxes or pretty pictures, attract the creative class; young professionals that will make small but numerous invenstments in a downtown. We care about taxes, but we care more about feeling like we have found a cool place to live. Consider that a young professional, under 30 and earning 40k a year and living in the commercial downtown, will spend 3-4x what a worker living outside of the downtown (working, not living in the downtown). The response of a "stupid sign" is the problem that faces your city. Lack of interest and pride in the small things that are unique to your city, that give it a sense of place that is not found anywhere else, is the problem that you need to overcome. Not who's in office and how much the unions are raking in. If you don't believe me, read those books that I listed above and focus on my statement as you read.
Please remember: I know Scranton has her problems. All urban centers do. But, Scranton leaves something that is desirable or people like you wouldn't be so concerned about her vitality. Fix your problems, but take pride in the accomplishments of your city, regardless of who spreadheaded the effort. Take some time this weekend to go out and enjoy your city instead of sitting at a computer and fuming about what bugs you. Lord knows that's what I'll do in Allentown and Bethlehem. And yes, if I'm deciding where to live in the Scranton area and I see a sign illuminated that tells me there is a sense of ownership and place, I'll move there, pay slightly higher taxes and likely raise my family. If you don't think there are tons of 22-30 year olds like me, then explain the rebirth of Bethlehem, West Chester, Downington, Kutztown, Maniyunk (the taxes in these towns are insane and I live in one of the highest in Eastern PA) and other small towns and cities across the commonwealth. It's my generation that's bringing them back and will maintain them and taxes aren't even on the radar.
Again, congrats. If you can't accept a compliment, the do your town a favor and get out. Go live in Kunkle. I hear taxes are low around there and the living is simple.
HERES YER SIGN!!!!!, just kidding, rather than fault you for your youthful naive beliefs I will just say, wait a few years, get some life experience under your belt, and reflect on your youthful ideals.I bet you dinner they will be very very different.
I have noticed "The Rise Of The Creative Class" mentioned on other forums ,I searched for reviews on the book and the majority of them are bad. I admit I have not read the book myself. but i would tend to agree with a majority opinion.. The synopsis leads me to believe it is just some new age yuppie i feel good about me B.S.
jack wrote: HERES YER SIGN!!!!!, just kidding, rather than fault you for your youthful naive beliefs I will just say, wait a few years, get some life experience under your belt, and reflect on your youthful ideals.I bet you dinner they will be very very different.
There is so much wrong with the way the city administration (as well as yuppies) think about economics and social policy. One thing that sticks out is that they do not see Scranton in world-historical context. In other words, they do not see the relationship or the link between Scranton and the entire world. They are economic nationalists. Scranton, along with many other cities in the United States, are not the same since 1970. The world is not the same since 1970. Certain U.S. cities popped up to become links in a commodity chain after the reordering of the capitalist world-economy during the 1970's. U.S. in particular lost its role as the worlds hegemon (finance, production, cultural, and leadership) but some cities popped up. What the literature that has been suggested to me says is the new role of these cities. Scranton is not one of these cities. Scranton is a peripherial area-- Scranton is like a 3rd world country in many ways.
What really pisses me off is that the yuppies believe they are the savior for the city.
If you want good literature read any urban studies on manual castells.
From what I have read and seen of Scranton, i agree that they do miss the nexus on social and economic policy. Unfortunately, many cities and towns seem to think that the focus has to be one or the other, but too often they cross at the same point. Creative leaders get that. Creative leaders wouldn't turn a KOZ into a residential district (it's happened in other areas with terrible results). That just blows my mind away! Scranton is just waiting for problems in the future on that one.
As for Richard Florida's book, it's really a great book. Get it at the library if you can. From the standpoint of urban studies scholarship, it's terrible. But from the standpoint of what is happening in cities, it's great b/c it mixes the sociology and the economics. More over, it goes into focus on the emerging demographics of cities in the 21st century. In short, since you're in a city with a university anchoring much of the current focus, you might want to get some insight on what makes the consumer base and the new residential base tick.
Just remember, many volunteers and stakeholders are working their tails off to turn the city around, many of whom have no political clout. The award Scranton Alive won should help those people feel as if they are going a good job. The award is not meant to validate political leadership that seems to be lacking in a grasp of urban policy and creative decision making. In fact, if any of the political leaders act as if they are responsible, point out that the volunteers did the fundraising and leg work, not the city.
As far as my youthful optimism, since i have family in the Scranton area, I'll let you know 10 years from now where we can go for dinner.
I do not deny that the sign itself is nice, however, I do not see it lasting long. It is loaded with incandecent bulbs and runs on 3 phase power. That just means it costs a TON to run! It's been my experience that people are very intense with these projects in the begining, but their enthusiasm tends to fade. I'm not really sure that the returns from one sign can justify the costs. As far as the residential KOZ's go. The Tripp Park development was an old strip mine. In the begining it was designated KOZ and the developer wanted to place an industrial site there. They even went so far as to plan a road directly onto the highway to eliminate heavy traffic in the residential section. The neighbors in the surrounding area fought the industrial development tooth and nail. In the end the developer was left with a chunk of KOZ land that could not be used for and industrial purpose. With the KOZ program, once it is designated, it's done. So, he was either going to build homes there, or just leave the land a burned out strip mine for kids to drink in, and people to dump their garbage on. I too was against it in the begining, until I understood all the facts behind it. As far as the "creative class" goes. I don't have much of an opinion one way or the other. However, we did have a "creative class" type restaurant open downtown. It lasted about six months and closed. The owner basically cast blame on the people of Scranton saying their menu was too sophisticated for our palates. A review in the Electric City blamed the terrible service. The man who purchased the former Leonards Hardware buliding on the 300 block of Adams avenue said in an electric city interview that in New York city you can get any type of food at any time. Here all we have to offer up is the same old heartburn. Now that isn't verbatum, but he did use the word heartburn. See, I'm very put off by this type of eliteist attitude. I am a life long resident and I am very offended by people who view us as a bunch of backwater hokes. New York city has 8,000,000+ people Scranton city has 72,000+. Go figure why we have a smaller choice of culture. What sells, sells, what doesn't goes. That's just the way that life works. I'm not trying to tear down entrepenuers, but don't blame me if your buisness drops the ball. And don't blame Scrantonians when they don't buy what you sell. If the creative class is about change, then they should be as willing to adapt as they expect us to be. A business serves it's customers, the customers do not serve the business.
The sign is expensive no doubt, but my understanding is that the development planning that was done for it included fundraising far above the actual cost of rehab. It included operating expenses as well so the concern about cost might be negated, unless we do have the energy crisis that we've all been warned about.
Regarding the creative class, I would suggest reading the book. A city of 72,000 is not doomed as a market b/c Bethlehem is about that size and is the historic section and the south side are both attractions for the Lehigh Valley, and I currently live in a town of 17,000 with a university that has been dubbed "The Perfect Town" by several newspapers. The concept of a town as a self-contained market no longer applies, not with the Home Depot and Wal Mart on the edge of any given town and the car being the preferred mode of transportation. It needs to be unique (cafe's, unique eating establishments, art galleries, odd shops, fancy bakeries, etc) from the regional market that already exists, offering goods and services that draw people into town on a friday evening or a Saturday/Sunday afternoon. After being drawn into town, the creative class will likely set up shop, living above shops or buying old town homes, renovating them, and living in them. Given the descriptions you listed of different establishments, I would guess that you might have a couple of bad business owners who failed to market their services well and also lacked in the delivery too. But revitalizing a town is about change, and I hate to say it, but the town typically has to change. Yes, businesses moving in and investers committing money need to respect the town's history, but if the political leaders and long time residents don't change significantly then the same results or similar results will repeat themselves. Trust me, I've been a downtown manager long enough to know what works and what it takes to make something work. Patience, an open mind and a willingness to experiment all go into the process. You don't have to be NYC to be successful but you do have to dream like you live in NY and act as if you are just as great a place to live and work.
Again, I wish Scanton and her people all the luck in the world in this endeavor and I'll be certain to come and shop/eat when I visit my family still living in the area. Who knows, maybe someday I'll have great reason to move back.
I believe you may be mistaken. As I recall the signs installatiton and lighting was delayed because they ran short of cash. I did not hear much talk about the cash required to operate it. At least it's nice to see someone post on here who isn't slaying Scranton. I'm glad you have a nice view and optomistic outlook on our town. I don't like to look at the downside of it, but I've been here a long time and I may be a bit more cynical. In this city what you read and what you see are two different things.